← Back to the Library
Quick Reference · Calculators

Surface Finish Chart —
Ra, RMS, and Rz Conversion with Process Ranges

By C&W Engineering Team
Convert between Ra in microinches, Ra in micrometres, and RMS, see the closest ISO N grade, and check which machining process can actually produce the finish your drawing calls out. Surface roughness callouts like 63 µin Ra or 1.6 Ra show up on nearly every machined part drawing; this page is the decoder.[1]
Surface finish converter
Type a value in any field and the others fill in. Ra conversions between units are exact; RMS uses the standard 1.11 × Ra approximation, and Rz is shown only as a range because there is no exact conversion.

Ra, RMS, and Rz: What Each Means

Ra (roughness average) is the arithmetic average deviation of the surface profile from its mean line, and it is the default roughness parameter on American drawings. A bare number in a surface finish symbol on a U.S. drawing means Ra in microinches; a bare number on a metric drawing means Ra in micrometres. The two differ by a factor of 39.37, which is the single most common surface finish misread: 32 µin and 0.8 µm are the same finish, but 32 µm would be a very rough one.[1]

RMS (root mean square) is an older parameter that weights peaks and valleys more heavily. For a typical machined surface RMS reads about 11% higher than Ra, so 64 RMS and 58 Ra describe roughly the same surface. RMS callouts persist on legacy drawings; treat an unlabeled callout on an old print with care and confirm which parameter was meant.[1][2]

Rz (mean peak-to-valley height) is common on European and Asian drawings. It measures the height between the highest peaks and deepest valleys over sampling lengths, so it runs much larger than Ra for the same surface: typically 4 to 7 times Ra, depending on the process. There is no exact conversion, which is why our converter reports Rz as a range. If a drawing specifies Rz, measure Rz.[1][2]

Surface Finish by Machining Process

Each process has a natural finish range. The low end takes sharp tooling, light finishing passes, and rigid setups; the high end is a roughing pass. When a drawing calls for a finish below a process's range, the part needs a second operation, and that is a cost driver worth designing around: 32 µin from the mill is routine, 16 µin usually means grinding, and single digits mean honing or lapping.[1][3]

Achievable Ra by process
Typical production ranges in microinches Ra, log scale. Values from the conversion table below; exceptional setups can beat the low end.

Surface Finish Conversion Table

The ISO N grades with their Ra equivalents in both unit systems, the approximate RMS value, and the processes that typically produce each finish.[1][2][3]

ISO gradeRa (µm)Ra (µin)RMS (µin, approx.)Typical production process
N125020002200Flame cutting, rough sand casting
N112510001100Sawing, torch-cut edges
N1012.5500555Rough turning and milling, sand casting
N96.3250278General roughing passes, drilling
N83.2125139Standard as-machined finish: turning, milling, drilling
N71.66370Finish turning and milling with care, reaming
N60.83236Fine machining, reaming, grinding
N50.41618Grinding, fine honing
N40.289Fine grinding, honing, lapping
N30.144.4Honing, lapping, polishing
N20.0522.2Lapping, superfinishing
N10.02511.1Superfinishing, optical lapping

How to Call It Out (and What It Costs)

The finish symbol on a drawing applies to the surface it touches; a symbol in the title block sets the default for everything else. 125 µin Ra is what ordinary machining produces without special effort, and 63 µin Ra is the standard callout for surfaces that matter: sealing faces, bearing seats, locating features. 32 µin Ra is achievable in the machining operation with sharp tooling and finish passes. Below that, plan on grinding or honing as a separate operation with its own setup and cost.[3]

The practical rule is the same one that governs tolerances: specify the roughest finish that works. A 16 µin callout on a clamped, painted bracket face adds grinding time and inspection burden for a surface nobody will ever measure. And remember that machining finish and applied coatings interact: anodize slightly roughens a surface, plating follows the substrate finish, and a bead blast resets the whole conversation.

Ra does not capture everything
Two surfaces with identical Ra can behave differently. Ra is an average, so it says nothing about lay (the direction of tool marks, which matters for seals), isolated scratches (an average barely moves from one deep scratch a seal will leak past), or waviness. Critical sealing and bearing surfaces often need a lay symbol and sometimes an Rz or Rmax limit alongside Ra. When a surface really matters, say more about it than one number.
In plain terms
Surface finish numbers are averages of how bumpy a surface is. Small number, smooth surface, more money. The everyday landmarks: 125 is standard machining, 63 is careful machining and the most common callout that matters, 32 is the best a milling or turning operation routinely does, and anything below 16 means a grinding or honing operation was added. If a drawing shows 1.6 with no units, it is metric and means 63 in American units, not a mirror finish.

Finish verified on real parts

C&W measures surface finish with calibrated profilometers and documents it with each lot under our AS9100D quality system.

Request a Quote
Sources & References
[1]ASME B46.1 — Surface Texture (Surface Roughness, Waviness, and Lay): parameter definitions for Ra, RMS (Rq), and Rz, and measurement practice.
[2]ISO 1302 / ISO 21920 — Indication of surface texture in technical product documentation: the N grade series N1 to N12 and their Ra equivalents. RMS ≈ 1.11 × Ra and Rz ≈ 4 to 7 × Ra are the accepted engineering approximations; neither is an exact conversion.
[3]Machinery's Handbook, 31st Edition — Surface Texture section: achievable roughness ranges by production process.